Archaeologist have traditionally subdivided artifacts
into morphological classifications based on distinguishing attributes
and/or functional characteristics. Some artifacts can be used as chronological
markers because they have distinct characteristics and their type have
been recovered in
situ with datable materials. The materials associated with the artifact
is dated using radiocarbon
dating or other dating methods to determine their age and therefore
the approxiamate age of the artifact. With the information provided from
these in situ artifacts, archaeologists are able to identify assembleges
of artifacts that are common to certain periods of time within a geographical
local.
In Texas, cultural time periods are divided into the Paleo-Indian,
Archaic,
Late
Prehistoric and Historic.
These periods are often further sub-divided into phases and are usually
distinct for each region found within the state.
We used the chronology presented by Thomas R. Hester
for South Texas, A Field Guide to Stone Artifacts of Texas Indians
(Turner and Hester, 1992) and Prehistoric Artifacts of the Texas
Indians (Davis, 1995), to assist students in identifying some of
the stone artifacts and for cross-dating. Since the Redland Oaks' artifacts
had been displaced, neither relative
nor absolute
dating was possible.
We also relyed the expertise of C. K. Chandler, A Texas
Historical Commission Steward and archaeologist. Mr. Chandler kindly donated
his free time to review the analysis made on the Redland Oaks Artifacts.
He and Mrs. Kay Hindes also visited the school to commend the students
for their efforts. Mr. Dan R. Davis, Jr. generously donated a copy of
his book to the school library and gave us permission to use any of his
information or photographs in our educational effort.
Below are examples of the artifacts discovered, analyzed
and described by students. They are grouped by cultural periods from the
Historic through the Paleo-Indian. The objects were scanned and are actual
size in the section that describes them.