Disadvantaged & At Risk Students
| PHILOSOPHY | PROGRAM MAP |
FOR THE PROGRAM |
| GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR |
INDICATORS OF EXCELLENCE |
|
|
INDICATORS OF EXCELLENCE |
INDICATORS OF EXCELLENCE |
Executive Director for Curriculum Compliance - Don Dalton
804-7180 ext. 357
Director for Curriculum Compliance - Elaine Hitzfelder
804-7180 ext. 366
PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN
AND CHILDREN IN AT-RISK SITUATIONS
A high-quality education for all individuals and a fair and equal opportunity to obtain that education are a social good, are a moral imperative, and improve the life of every individual because the quality of our individual lives ultimately depends on the quality of the lives of others.
![]()
Title 1 - Helping Disadvantaged Children Meet High Standards (Public Law 103-382.Sec. 1001)
Purpose
To enable schools to provide opportunities for children served to acquire the knowledge and skills contained in the challenging State content standards and to meet the challenging State performance standards developed for all children.
![]()
State Compensatory Education (Texas Education Code, Sections 29.081)
Purpose
To enhance and improve the regular education program for children in at-risk situations. The purpose is to increase the academic achievement and reduce the dropout rate of identified students.
![]()
Optional Extended Year Program (Texas Education Code, Section 29.082)
Purpose
The purpose of the OEYP is to provide students with Aadditional time@ to master the state=s challenging content standards and student performance standards.
Core Value
All children can master challenging content and complex problem-solving skills when expectations are high and opportunity is provided to learn challenging material.
Critical Attributes
-
Attention is focused on the academic development of each child.
-
There are no acceptable excuses for the failure of any child.
-
A variety of learning style strengths are accommodated.
-
Every member of the school is valued equally and treated as a necessary part of the family.
-
The work of all participants in the school is based on collaboration with other participants and trust in the support that will be available.
-
The work of the school is motivated by a passion for learning.
BACK TO THE TOP OF PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED & AT-RISK STUDENTS

BACK TO THE TOP OF PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED & AT-RISK STUDENTS
North East Guiding Principles
for
Programs for Disadvantaged Children and Children in At-Risk Situations
|
Guiding Principles for Program Implementation |
Bibliographic Sources |
|
Necessity - The need for school improvement is imperative in order to meet the changing social and economic conditions. We must change because the world is changing. Our challenge is to establish a system of education that ensures that all students learn to read, write, and compute to apply their skills to read real-life problems, and to become responsible and productive citizens. We must provide each and every child with the chance to achieve to the highest academic standards. We must build upon their individual and collective gifts and address the challenges they bring to the nation=s schools. The use of student achievement data can communicate the need for improvement and the excellent potential for achieving that improvement. By spotlighting successful schools, programs, and teachers, the implicit message is that if this could happen in one class-room, why not in all classrooms. Academic goals should capture the sense of urgency for improved achievement. They should be challenging enough to generate a sense of excitement, a sense of anticipation and expectation. Goals should be articulated in a way that apply to all students. The public reporting of student and school performance establishes an accountability system that clearly identifies excellence in education. There will be no excuses and no obstacles such as poor students, poor neighborhoods, or single parent families. The development and maintenance of a sense of urgency requires ongoing attention. School personnel should work collaboratively with the community by openly sharing data, listening to concerns and articulating a vision that renews hope, rewards effort, and inspires a passion for continuous improvement. |
Grasmick, Nancy S. 1999. Pursuing a Common Vision. Maryland State Department of Education. Ragland, Mary, Asera, Rose, & Johnson, Joe. 1999. Urgency, Responsibility, Efficacy: Preliminary Findings of a Study of High-Performing Texas School Districts. The Charles A. Dana Center, The University of Texas at Austin. Secada, Walter G. 1998. No More Excuses: The Final Report of the Hispanic Dropout Project. University of Wisconsin - Madison. U.S. Secretary of Education for Hispanic and Limited English Proficient Students. 1998. Improving Opportunities; a Response to the Hispanic Dropout Project. |
|
Accountability - The energy and resources of each school are focused precisely on the task of improving academic achievement in a way that leads everyone to understand their responsibility for influencing change. Schools can stay focused on district goals if educators have believable, workable campus plans and ongoing visible and public analysis about academic progress. They also practice flexibility and accountability. High, clear expectations for performance are communicated to all educators. Everyone is held accountable for specific improvement in student achievement. The ongoing questions are, AWhere are we? What are we doing? Where do we want to be? Are we willing to do what it takes to get there?@ Acceptable progress is rewarded with flexibility in decisions regarding programs, personnel, budget and professional development. Improved academic achievement is not accidental, it is planned. Those with responsibility for implementing plans have a substantial role in developing them. The whole staff needs to be involved in developing a vision for accomplishing the challenging goals and creating a practical plan to achieve those goals. A common vision is shaped by the emerging information age. Every day we see new evidence of this transformation, and new reason to prepare our students to become knowledgeable workers. Our under-standing that all students must learn at high levels gives new meaning to John Dewey=s vision of universal education. AWhat the best and wisest parents want for their children,@ he said, Athat must the community want for all children.@ |
Lein, L. Johnson, J.F., & Ragland, M. 1996. Successful Texas Schoolwide Programs Research Summary. Available from the Charles A. Dana Center, University of Texas at Austin, 2901 North IH-35, Suite 2.200, Austin, Texas 78722-2348 Murphy, John & Doyle, Dennis. 1999. No Finish Line. National Staff Development Council. Ragland, Mary, Asera, Rose, & Johnson, Joe. 1999. Urgency, Responsibility, Efficacy: Preliminary Findings of a Study of High-Performing Texas School Districts. The Charles A. Dana Center, The University of Texas at Austin. Riley, Richard W., Secretary of Educ. 1999. Speech Before the U.S. Committee on Education on the Re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965. Sizer, Ted. Noted Educator and National Lecturer. |
|
Effectiveness - High expectations are accompanied by high quality support. Dramatic changes in academic results will occur if classroom instruction improves. Support structures are created to help educators to teach Asmarter@ and continuously learn from their own practices and from the practices of others. Professional development requires that teachers be provided many opportunities to meet together to analyze data, to plan, to examine and adjust the curriculum, to reflect upon their own instructional practices, and to examine and discuss student work. These structures help create a culture of continuous professional development and improvement, with an emphasis on data-driven, research-based decision making. The continuous search for opportunities to learn from the success of others is important. Educators learn by examining current research, constantly questioning experts, and continually searching for promising practices. School personnel should have access to information made available from education service centers, universities, and other technical assistance providers. |
Barth, Roland. Noted Educator and National Lecturer. Hargreaves, Andy. Noted educator and National Lecturer. United State Department of Education. 1998. Turning Around Low-Performing Schools. |
BACK TO THE TOP OF PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED & AT-RISK STUDENTS
|
Bibliographic Sources | |
|
Curriculum - The curriculum is enriched, accelerated, and organized in a manner that supports each student=s most rapid progression toward skills mastery. |
Brandt, Ron. 1998. Powerful Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Rauhauser, W. and McLennan, A. 1995. America=s Schools - Making Them Work. New View Publications, Chapel Hill, NC |
|
Language Acquisition and Learning - Often economically disadvantaged students and students in at-risk situations do not have access to the formal register of language at home; that is, the standard sentence syntax and word choice of work and school. Students develop formal register when taught directly and encouraged to participate in the writing and telling of stories and the use of stories in math, social studies, and science to develop concepts. |
Fox, Steven. AThe Controversy over Ebonics@. Phi Delta Kappan. November 1997. Volume 79. Number 3. Payne, Ruby. 1998. A Framework for Understanding Poverty, 1998. RFT Publishing Co. Rodriguez, Luis J. 1993. Always Running. New York, NY; Simon & Schuster, 1993. |
|
Learning Strategies - Teachers use multiple strategies to motivate students. Students are actively involved in productive activity and praised for success in the classroom. Instruction is individualized as needed. Different learning style strengths are accommodated. The staff communicates their positive regard for students, has high expectations for student success, and promotes students= positive attitudes toward school. |
Gardner, Howard. Noted Educator and National Lecturer. Payne, Ruby. 1998. A Framework for Understanding Poverty, 1998. RFT Publishing Co. |
|
Parental Involvement - Parents assist with the instructional program, attend instructional programs designed for them, and assist with the instructional program. |
O=Sullivan, Rita G. and Tennant, Cheryl V. 1993. Programs for At-Risk Students. Carwin Press Inc. Newbury Park, CA. |
|
Relationships - The key to achievement for students is in creating relationships with them. Relationships always begin as one individual to another. First and foremost in all relationships with students is the relationship between teacher and student, then between each student and each administrator, and finally, among all of the players, including student-student relationships. To honor students as human beings worthy of respect and care is to establish a relationship that will provide for enhanced learning. |
Zill, Nicholaus. AThe Changing Realities of Family Life@. Winter, 1993. Aspen Institute Quarterly, Volume 5. Number 1. |
BACK TO THE TOP OF PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED & AT-RISK STUDENTS
INDICATORS OF EXCELLENCE
|
The District will: |
The campuses will: |
|
|
BACK TO THE TOP OF PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED & AT-RISK STUDENTS
INDICATORS OF EXCELLENCE
|
The District will: |
The campus will: |
|
|
BACK TO THE TOP OF PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED & AT-RISK STUDENTS
OPTIONAL EXTENDED YEAR PROGRAM
INDICATORS OF EXCELLENCE
|
The District will: |
The Middle School Summer School Campus will: |
|
|
BACK TO THE TOP OF PROGRAMS FOR DISADVANTAGED & AT-RISK STUDENTS